Genius of the Rules-Style System

Chapter 655: Chapter 369 The Importance of Supersymmetry Problem_2

If it were not for Zhao Yi’s strong influence, the ’Boundary Theory of Particles’ might not have been widely known. Even if some scholars came across it, they might have simply set it aside, never bothering to delve into its content.

However, things were different with the new papers involving ’Supersymmetry’.

’Supersymmetry’ is the cornerstone, the foundation of theoretical physics, but the theoretical symmetry between particles has never been experimentally discovered.

The physics community hopes for the emergence of a particle symmetry that may not be experimental, but the ’Supersymmetry Problem’, especially the so-called ’symmetry’, requires an acceptable explanation.

There had been none until now.

The theory of Supersymmetry seems perfect, and research from the perspective of particles makes it hard to add anything new.

Now, with Zhao Yi’s individual Boundary Theory of Particles, also known as ’Particle Energy Theory’, to explain and analyze the Supersymmetry Problem, it’s valuable enough to be considered for further investigation. frёeωebɳovel.com

When many scholars plunged into the research, they found the papers to be abstruse and difficult to understand. They soon realized why—

This paper is fundamentally based on the ’Energy Theory’ or ’Boundary Theory of Particles’. To those who hadn’t researched the ’Boundary Theory of Particles’, understanding the mathematical content of the paper naturally proved extremely challenging.

Many of them immediately began studying about the Boundary Theory of Particles.

Compared to Supersymmetry analysis, the mathematics involved in the Boundary Theory is not particularly difficult for top-tier mathematicians.

The Boundary Theory of Particles essentially seems like a framework of formulas and rules.

Once you understand this framework of rules and formulas, understanding the new Supersymmetry analysis paper becomes significantly easier.

Shortly afterward.

A heavyweight scholar came forward to acknowledge Zhao Yi’s contribution.

It was Edward Witten.

Witten had collaborated with Zhao Yi in multi-dimensional boundary research and had a profound understanding of the Boundary Theory of Particles. Given his expertise and level, understanding ’Supersymmetry Analysis’ wasn’t necessarily easy, but neither was it particularly difficult.

Edward Witten was among the first to receive the published paper. As its content was to be published, he managed to understand it thoroughly despite certain sections being omitted, and he publicly claimed, "This is an exciting piece of research."

"The Supersymmetry Problem has always persisted but without any progress. While it hasn’t been observed in experiments, research has stagnated. However, it remains highly significant."

"Zhao Yi used the Boundary Theory of Particles to demonstrate the Supersymmetry Problem, and offered a completely new perspective for understanding subatomic particles."

"This is remarkable, it truly is."

"Actually, before the paper was published, he had told me that he had completed the analysis of Supersymmetry. At the time I was greatly excited, but after reading this paper, I realized my initial excitement wasn’t nearly enough!"

Lastly, Edward Witten remarked, "I believe that in the future, the Boundary Theory of Particles will receive more recognition, and the related research will see more progress."

Edward Witten’s personal viewpoint had a significant impact due to his academic influence, sweeping across Princeton Institute for Advanced Study.

The Princeton Institute for Advanced Study reacted quickly. They didn’t comment on the Supersymmetry proof, but announced their acceptance of the ’Boundary Theory of Particles’.

This was a significant announcement.

Like when Harvard University announced their acceptance of string theory, effectively validating it, and subsequently included corresponding courses in the university, also hiring several young string theory scholars.

Now, the acceptance of the Boundary Theory of Particles by the Princeton Institute for Advanced Study is equivalent to Princeton University announcing, "Starting from today, we accept the Boundary Theory of Particles and will consider hiring researchers in this field in the future, as well as considering introducing related courses in the university."

This is the most direct form of recognition.

At the time of intense international discussions, domestic reactions were notably swift.

Although the majority of scholars still didn’t understand the ’Supersymmetry Analysis’ paper, universities have already started voicing their opinions. Following Shuimu University and Capital University, more than a dozen universities subsequently announced their acceptance of the ’Boundary Theory of Particles’.

Previously, the ’Boundary Theory of Particles’ was only Zhao Yi’s theory and only Yanhua University had announced its acceptance.

Other universities were in a state of watchfulness, as there were not many scholars primarily researching the Boundary Theory of Particles.

But now it’s different.

Zhao Yi bases his Supersymmetry analysis on his Boundary Theory of Particles, effectively telling the world, "The Boundary Theory of Particles offers broad research prospects."

In the future, there will definitely be more scholars who will participate in research based on the Boundary Theory of Particles.

A week went by.

Several domestic and international scholars have come forward to acknowledge the ’Supersymmetry’ analysis research.

The symbolic acceptance by the Princeton Institute for Advanced Study, and Edward Witten’s substantial influence, cannot be ignored. Still, the Princeton Institute for Advanced Study only accepted the Boundary Theory of Particles, remaining reserved on the ’Supersymmetry’ analysis.

Now it’s different.

A host of mathematicians and physicists, gathered together to discuss ’Supersymmetry’ analysis, found the mathematical analysis in the paper to be classic. The fresh perspective introduced using energy as the basis was cause for much admiration.

Once they received the endorsement of more mathematicians and physicists, the Princeton Institute for Advanced Study immediately publicly affirmed Zhao Yi’s ’Supersymmetry’ analysis.

It was a signal!

The influence of Princeton Institute for Advanced Study is considerable. Their endorsement indicated that there was no problem with the ’Supersymmetry’ analysis.

The global academic community was instantly in an uproar.

Supersymmetry can be directly understood as the symmetry problem of fermions and bosons, but on a broader scale, it has become the foundation of theoretical physics. It possesses extraordinary charm and can solve many theoretical physics problems.

For instance, the infamous hierarchy problem in the standard model of particles, i.e., why there is a disparity of ten or so orders of magnitude between the electroweak unification energy scale and the grand unification or Planck energy scale?

For example, the numerous divergent results in ordinary quantum field theory can be cancelled out by supersymmetric partners’ contributions in supersymmetry theory, making supersymmetry theory superior in terms of renormalization properties.

Furthermore, although no experimental evidence exists for supersymmetry, it does have a theoretical "proof" from grand unification theory.

The above are just a few properties and applications of Supersymmetry. In fact, as theoretical physics has developed to the present day, the shadow of the Supersymmetry concept can be seen in almost all frontier fields of physics.

If the field of theoretical physics is described as the ’natural world’, then Supersymmetry can be described as Newton’s mechanics. Newtonian mechanics is a kind of explanation for the forces in the natural world and a summary of natural laws. It’s the most basic law and concept. The difference is that the research on Supersymmetry has not progressed. One can imagine that if Newton’s mechanics was suddenly proven wrong one day, it would certainly cause a super seismic event in academia, and conversely, proving its reality and existence would provide fundamental support for theoretical physics research. frёewebηovel.cѳm

After Zhao Yi’s ’Supersymmetry’ analysis theory was recognized, the journal "Mathematical Progress" gave it high praise, stating that ’The research is a milestone in the field of theoretical physics’.

Other academic media and magazines also immediately made comments, "This is very important. The new perspective of Supersymmetry analysis has brought a new direction to theoretical physics research..."

"It has unique views and perfect mathematical logic. The research is pioneering..."

If such high recognition was given internationally, one can imagine the situation domestically.

Domestic media made many related reports, in which the importance of the ’Supersymmetry Problem’ was also popularized.

There were also numerous discussions on the Internet.

People outside the academic circles, most of whom did not understand the importance of ’Supersymmetry’, only felt it was something very powerful, but that did not affect their enthusiasm for gossip about the issue, because Zhao Yi was behind the achievement once again.

In the past few years, major mathematical and physical achievements seem to be inseparable from the name Zhao Yi.

Zhao Yi had once again sparked a debate in public opinion.