Genius of the Rules-Style System

Chapter 273: Chapter 196: This is the most promising career!_2

This proves the correctness of genetics.

So in reality, Qingzi must not be Akagi Gangken’s real sister, at least not from the same father and mother.

If they are from the same mother but different fathers...

It is said the unfaithfulness rate of RB’s women is consistently high; perhaps there is some connection!?

...

The conjectural paper on the ’mechanism of myocarditis’ and the effect of its experimental validation are still fermenting continuously.

When the Biomedical Research Institute first announced a simple experiment to validate the conjecture process and assert its correctness, the influence was not very significant. For medical mechanism research, simple experiments can’t explain much.

In the following days, the Institute constantly released news about successful verifications. The successful verifications were not a big sensation, as multiple experiments don’t necessarily mean much. In the field of medical research, in order to validate the entire process, we need to design a large ’group of experiments’, which can take a long time. Most of the important tests can only be designed after the virus has completely disappeared from the myocardium of mice.

So in a short span of time, the conclusions from the experiments are not very significant.

But there is one point that is overshadowing. With the conclusions from the completed experiments, none of them has been proven wrong.

This is truly astonishing!

According to normal logic, there must be something wrong somewhere in the ’mechanism of myocarditis conjecture’ process, even if it is based on the logic of disease mechanisms, and making reasonable assessments. Wherever there are inaccuracies, the initial experiments should have exposed mistakes.

But the results...

Not a single mistake?

Is the Biomedical Research Institute releasing false news, or is there really nothing wrong with the experimental verification?

This has even sparked discussion in the field of medical research.

Other medical research agencies, which had originally been observers, have begun to show interest in the contents of the paper after seeing the news released by the Biomedical Research Institute, and have also started designing experiments for verification.

They don’t have any direct relation with Zhao Yi and conducting the verification will confer no benefit to them. They definitely won’t invest a lot of resources, but laboratories with similar research can rely on existing resources to design some experiments.

A week has passed.

Some organizations that conducted the verification have stepped forward and publicly announced their experimental verification results, which almost unanimously support the hypothesis about the mechanism of myocarditis.

At this point, some medical research institutions started issuing comments saying, "Perhaps Zhao Yi’s mechanism conjecture is all correct."

"That is really terrifying!"

"Impossible!"

"But so far, all the conclusions support his point of view, which also implies that most of the subsequent experiments will support it. We cannot be sure it is completely correct, but we can be sure that most of it is correct."

This conclusion seems unbelievable.

Just like Dai Tianqing and Han Hui’s initial feelings, it’s hard for medical researchers to believe that through thinking and ’rationally designed inference’, the mystery surrounding the highly difficult mechanism project can be uncovered, while most of their work just improves the project little by little. Most of the time there isn’t even any progress.

Now, someone’s thought-based conjecture has finished the significantly meaningful ’mechanism of myocarditis’ project?

It’s hard to accept...

As many medical researchers were doubting themselves, veteran academician Zheng Yingru took a stand. She openly accepted an interview with reporters, discussed the issue of experimental verification, and also talked about medical research.

"Many people in the field of medical research often have a feeling that medical research, especially in the field of pathological mechanisms, relies heavily on luck. Maybe you discover something suddenly, and the research will progress. If you are not lucky and do not discover anything for a long time, there won’t be any progress."

"This is not right!"

"In my view, medical research is no different from other fields. It depends not on hard work or luck, but on solid foundations, seriousness in work, and talent. You can’t do without any of these." freёweɓnovel.com

"From the point of view of normal pathological mechanism research, a ’medical mechanism conjecture’ is like a child who doesn’t even know how to walk yet suddenly knows how to run. It doesn’t make sense to rely on the brain to perfect the mechanism process, instead of making conclusions step by step through experiments."

"However, we cannot deny that there are some geniuses in the world who can perhaps run immediately or even fly."

"We can discern from the conjectural paper that it is not a fabrication of imagination, but is supported by observed experiments."

"It’s like running on the road with only a few roadblocks. Most people will lose direction, but some people can determine if they are on the right road based on the position and direction of the roadblocks."

"It’s very clear from the analogy just now: some people can’t draw clear conclusions from obvious experimental results, while some people can come up with reasonable ideas from simple experiments. If you summarize these reasonable ideas, you might be able to form a complete set of pathological inferences."

"Therefore, I believe that in medical research, especially on the study of pathological mechanisms, talent is also very important."

Zheng Yingru’s meaning is essentially that most people conducting medical research are ordinary people, without any medical research talent. They rely on numerous experiments to make progress in their research and experimental projects.